Before one thinks more of my sainted mother would like me to explain my argument to say categorically that I support this initiative and that this type arise.
I, like many of you know, a member of IU, and this will not change, it will not change simply because I believe places like this are not confronted with UI, I think added from different nuances but with a common axis to clearly given left UI.
After much confrontation within my organization I have learned that these fratricidal struggles do little, if anything, degrade the image of the organizations and make us lose time to build an alternative to the neoliberal model. On this I think the important premise is to add from the various nuances that each of us, respect, nonjudgmental, peer positions in the trenches, because that we are without a doubt, fellow left in a constant struggle for a better world.
Many will say, but as this can now speak of not confronting?, I admit, I've been a long time tocapelotas, but maybe now I assimilated that I can not change, nor I can dismount the donkey to their positions and partners on the left, that was the big mistake I made and that many others commit.
As I have decided not to waste more time trying to convince my colleagues of my nuances in the positions left-wing think others should also assimilate this premise, we can not change partners, we must learn to live together in the great common space we have.
I raised in this space and many other adaptive process my reluctance to IU, as I said I think a slow process of building common in the left should not be done from the main shaft of a political force, capitalizing on the process and its conclusions, this axis must be critical citizenship, supported by political and social organizations, but without trying to lead anything a priori, I think therein lies the error of the overhaul of IU. We should be more generous and find common areas, do not pretend phagocytose any movement close to the left under criticism. Nor should we see movements as threats to plural Area IU, I think diversity is the greatness of the critical left. I think
Plura space with UI and many other social movements, unions and politicians can come together in the vast majority of actions and positions, I think the ways in politics must change and now we should be able to build an alternative to human capital UI and human capital for different reasons is IU.
New ways of doing politics go, from my point of view, to change the decision-making scheme, I think we should give citizenship spaces where they and they are political actors and parties then move these proposals to the institutions through the left common ground, each with its own nuances, but with a common premise that citizenship is the lead this common front the left.
If IU is able to see this as an opportunity to come together and add assets to the common cause, to banish the neoliberal policies and opt for a defense, along with other political actors, understanding the political agent of organized citizens, we can create like other many countries around, front left common plural. We must make the revolution and the revolution happens, from my point of view, to generate spaces where citizens meaningfully participate in political processes.
This may be one of those places, maybe not, but a priori, no one without prejudice, can assert that it is an attack on IU or any movement or organization of the Left critique of the state.
